Customised procedure packs create cost savings
In 2011, Ramsay Health Care in the United Kingdom decided to act on feedback from clinical staff, which put the drawbacks of generic surgical packs in the spotlight (time investment in set-up and restocking, component wastage and need for additional, single-packed components). When clinical staff are unhappy, O.R. efficiency is hampered. The process was instigated when an operating theatre manager attended a talk about the Mölnlycke Health Care OREPP (Operating Room Efficiency Partnership) program, which, combined with staff complaints on wastage in generic packs, moved the hospitals to action.
Ramsay Health Care listened to input from clinical personnel who expect to have the right tools at the right time, leading to an assessment of the cost and efficiency savings made possible by adopting procedure and site-specific surgical packs. While procedure-specific packs pose a higher upfront cost, an initial case study conducted at NHS Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University hospitals, followed by the full eight-hospital Ramsay study, illustrated significant cost savings and component wastage reduction overall.
The aim of the study was to define and reduce wastage and maximise efficiency in surgical packs. The study examined whether (and how) moving from generic or standardised to customised surgical procedure packs from Mölnlycke Health Care would effect real cost and component wastage savings.
47,000 GBP saved
The results show multiple positive outcomes from introducing ProcedurePak packs across the eight hospital sites. The most notable of these results is an annual saving of 47,000 GBP, mainly due to the fact that the participating Ramsay hospitals were able to reduce the number of wasted components by 96,181 items.
For further information, please download: